On the move

Notes from talk by Jonathan Miller at the Estorick Collection, 20 February 2010. Curator of exhibition On the Move.

Actions (intended, motivated, teleological, prompted by interests) vs Events (merely caused, eg stone rolling down hill). [Dennett]

Edgerton – actions of individuals, but also events (1940s): bullets, milk drop with coronet.

Marey – science of action. Went beyond Muybridge capturing single moments, to capture in a single frame the successive stages; “stroboscopic“. Muybridge is cinematic; Marey can’t be. Futurists were more influenced by Marey than Muybridge. Impression vs illusion of movement.

Cinema exploits unforseen susceptibility of human brain to successive stages of movement (stills). We have evolved to be exploitable by movies! An accessory advantage or ‘free rider’; not something we were evolved to do, no selective advantage.

Movies & machine guns.

In the exhibition: phenakistoscope, thaumatoscope, praxinoscope, zoetrope.

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: